LP+Week+4

// All ways of thinking, more or less perceptibly, lead through language in a manner that is extraordinary. //

Reading The Telephone Book #makesnosense#couldnthearanything # whotalksonthephone #teamtext
 * _| Lindsay Poirier @lindsaypoirier Sep 25

New Note
_ **Today** The Question Concerning Technology --[Questing x] [After x][Technics x]

"According to ancient doctrine, the essence [goings-on x] of a thing is considered to be what the thing is."

Technology [technics x] definitions – means to an end, human activity

Correct vs. true – correct aligns with reason and true aligns with reality?

Four causes: material, form, aim, producer (cause) – “differ from one another yet belong together”

“What is the bringing forth in which the fourfold way of occasioning plays?”

Presencing, unconcealing, revealing, truth [reality], correctness [reason] of an idea

“What has the essence[goings-on x] of technology to do with revealing? The answer: eve

SuZizzleXoXo
Sep 25, 2013, 11:46 PM _ Please tell me u werent really reading the telephone book...hashtag u have no life _ rything. For every bringing forth is grounded in revealing.” [bringing forth rules 4 causalities]

“Technology [technics x] is therefore no mere means. Technology [technics x] is a way of revealing. ...realm of revealing, i.e. of truth.”

“When man, in his way,from within unconcealment reveals that which presences, he merely responds to the call of unconcealment even when he contradicts it. Thus when man, investigating, observing, ensnares nature as an area of his own con

_

IOS 7 Upgrade Now Available
_

ceiving, he has already been claimed by a way of revealing that challenges him to approach nature as an object of research, until even the object disappears into the objectlessnes of standing-reserve [standing-stock x].”

“Enframing [emplacement x] means the gathering together of that setting-upon which sets upon man, i.e., challenges him forth, to reveal the real, in the mode of ordering [placing order x], as standing-reserve [standing-stock x].” “In Enframing [emplacement x], that unconcealment comes to pass in conformity with which the work of modern technology [technics x] reveals the real as standing-reserve [standing-stock x].”

"Freedom is the realm of the destining that at any given time starts a revealing upon its way."

"In Whatever way the destining of revealing may hold sway, the unconcealment in which everything that is shows itself at any given time harbors the danger that man may quail at the unconcealed and may misinterpret it."

SuZizzleXoXo
Sep 26, 2013, 12:22 AM _

homework...cant talk _

"Man stands so decisively in attendance on the challenging-forth of Enframing [emplacement x] that he does not apprehend Enframing [emplacement x] as a clai

_ U seriously go 2 the strangest school _

m, that he fails to see himself as the one spoken to, and hence also fails in every way to hear in what respect he ek-sists, from out of his essence [goings-on x], in the realm of an exhortation or address, and thus can never encounter only himself."

"Enframing [emplacement x] blocks the shining-forth and holding-sway of truth."

"The rule of Enframing [emplacement x] threatens man with the possibility that it could be denied to him to enter into a more original revealing and hence to experience the call of a more primal truth."

and then there was Weber: "and it is here that the dangerous destiny of technics [technology x] emerges; the possibility of forgetting entirely the dependence of emplacement [enframing x] upon the displacement of a poetical 'bring-forth' that breaks ground and opens up ways."

"The granting that sends in one way or another into revealing is as such the saving power. For the saving power lets man see and enter into the hi

555-555-5555
Sep 26, 2013, 12:43 AM _ hey, what r u up 2? _ _

Who is this? _

ghest dignity of his essence [goings-on x] ."

and then there was Weber: "For this reason, the challenge grant of tech

_ o come on...u know who this is _ _ No, I seriously don't  _ nics [technology x] exhorts, goads forth, sets on its way. And since it is a way of emplacement [enframing x], it goes nowhere, neither forward nor backward, nor even sideways, but simply on, on-going from place to place, always in place, never in place.

"The closer we come to the danger, the more brightly do the ways into the saving power begin to shine and the more questioning [questing x] we become. For questioning [questing ??? x] is the piety of thought."

and then there was Weber: "Only when the stability of the most familiar phrases and concepts can no longer be taken for granted, only when they reveal themselves to be possessed by unsuspected significations that no conceptual univocity can reliably predict or fully account for, only then does the reader sense fully the necessity of calling into question the conceptual matrix of modern representational thought: that of subject and object. For to call it into question, one must already be on the way elsewhere."

(1/2) From [|#TheTelephoneBook] [|#Heidegger] does not think so (he is, to be precise, not of that "opinion"). He takes the phone in his hand and
 * _| Lindsay Poirier @lindsaypoirier Sep 25

(2/2), covering the mouthpiece, says to Spiegel: the essential thing about technology is that man if himself cannot control it."
 * _| Lindsay Poirier @lindsaypoirier Sep 25